Article 5. - Airport Industrial (AI)


17.07.510 - Intent.

The airport industrial designation is intended to provide a land use classification that accommodates the industrial, commercial, and aviation-oriented uses that exist and are envisioned for Sanderson Field. This land use promotes flexibility while addressing changes in market demands, and ensures sensitive design practices are utilized within the City of Shelton gateway corridor. Development along U.S. 101 should strive to be consistent with guidance provided in "The Washington Coastal Corridor: U.S. 101 Corridor Master Plan."

(Ord. No. 47-09, Attach. A, 6-2-2009)

17.07.520 - Definitions.

A.

"The City of Shelton Gateway Corridor" describes the gateway corridor generally along U.S. 101, being one of the three distinct gateways in Shelton described in the land use element of the City of Shelton comprehensive plan. As defined herein, the gateway corridor shall include the area as indicated on the City of Shelton future land use map extending two hundred feet from the edge of the U.S. 101 right-of-way.

(Ord. No. 47-09, Attach. A, 6-2-2009)

17.07.530 - Permitted uses.

All uses shall act in accordance with "Chapter IV Port of Shelton Comprehensive Plan (dated November 6, 2006, or as amended) and be consistent with the activities, purposes, and land uses intended within the specific zoning district where the use is proposed.

(Ord. No. 47-09, Attach. A, 6-2-2009)

17.07.550 - Setback and open space requirements.

This land use does not require building and development coverage requirements, minimum lot sizes and lot widths except when required by the Port of Shelton, or to address project-specific environmental or design issues. Building setbacks that provide minimum required fire access, noise separation, and areas for landscaping between buildings and driveways, public or private roads, parking areas, adjacent buildings, or other improvements shall be developed as part of the leased space provided by the Port of Shelton. Development may be further restricted by airport overlay zoning where applicable.

(Ord. No. 47-09, Attach. A, 6-2-2009)

17.07.560 - Building size and height.

Except for structures deemed necessary for airport operations and allowed under the provisions of the airport overlay zoning airspace protection areas, no structures shall exceed thirty-six feet in height unless further restricted by the FAA. Deviation from this standard will be processed in accordance with Chapter 17.05.

(Ord. No. 47-09, Attach. A, 6-2-2009)

17.07.570 - Design review.

Uses proposed within the gateway and neighborhood commercial districts of the Sanderson Field master plan shall conform to the standards set forth in Chapter IV Port of Shelton Comprehensive Plan (dated November 6, 2006 or as amended). Development adjacent to Highway 101 must comply with the U.S. 101 Coastal Corridor Plan as referenced in the Sanderson Field Master Plan.

(Ord. No. 47-09, Attach. A, 6-2-2009)

17.07.580 - Sign requirements.

Signage shall conform to the Port of Shelton "Signage Master Plan & Tenant Signage Guidelines" dated May 27, 2003, or as amended.

(Ord. No. 47-09, Attach. A, 6-2-2009)

17.07.590 - Parking requirements.

New development shall provide a minimum required number of parking stalls in compliance with Section 17.08, Mason County Parking Standards.

(Ord. No. 47-09, Attach. A, 6-2-2009)

17.07.595 - Landscaping.

Landscaping shall meet all requirements of Chapter 17.07.800 [Sections 17.07.801—17.07.814], Landscaping and Screening in the Shelton UGA.

(Ord. No. 47-09, Attach. A, 6-2-2009)

17.07.598 - Appeals.

Administrative decisions of the Community Development Director or her/his designee shall be final and conclusive, unless a written statement of appeal is filed using the appeal procedures contained in Mason County Development Code Chapter 15.11, Appeals. Said statement shall set forth any alleged errors and/or the basis for appeal and shall be accompanied by a fee in an amount as set by resolution of the board.

The timely filing of an appeal shall stay the effective date of the decision until such time as the appeal is heard and decided or is withdrawn. The burden of proof regarding modification or reversal shall rest with the appellant.

(Ord. No. 47-09, Attach. A, 6-2-2009)